You are herecontent / Don't go, don't kill!
Don't go, don't kill!
By Cindy Sheehan, Al Jazeera
The recent repeal of the US military policy of "Don't ask, don't tell" is far from being the human rights advancement some are touting it to be. I find it intellectually dishonest, in fact, illogical on any level to associate human rights with any military, let alone one that is currently dehumanising two populations as well as numerous other victims of it's clandestine "security" policies.
Placing this major contention aside, the enactment of the bill might be an institutional step forward in the fight for "equality"; however institutions rarely reflect reality.
Do we really think that the US congress vote to repeal the act and Obama signing the bill is going to stop the current systemic harassment of gays in the military?
While I am a staunch advocate for equality of marriage and same-sex partnership, I cannot - as a peace activist - rejoice in the fact that now homosexuals can openly serve next to heterosexuals in one of the least socially responsible organisations that currently exists on earth: The US military.
It is an organisation tainted with a history of intolerance towards anyone who isn't a Caucasian male from the Mid-West. Even then I’m sure plenty fitting that description have faced the terror and torment enshrined into an institution that transforms the pride and enthusiasm of youth into a narrow zeal for dominating power relations.
Wrong battle for equality
It is hard to separate this issue from the activities of the military. War might be a "racket", but it is also the most devastating act one can be involved in, whether you are the aggressor or a victimised civilian, no one can shake off the psychological scars of war. No one.
Its effects on the individual as well as collective human psyche are terminal. Championing equal rights is an issue of morality, war is immoral, and the US military is heading further and further down the path of immorality.
Even with the advent of WikiLeaks, transparency and accountability of US military activity has been sucked into a black hole of silence. Drone attacks, illegal cross-border interventions, extra-judicial assassinations all occur in the name of national interest. It is not in the interest of equal rights activists to support an institution that is intent on ignoring every protocol of human decency.
Face it, gays are now and have been in the military since before Valley Forge during the Revolutionary War.
The only difference being one can now admit their orientation without fear of official recrimination - a major boon for the equal rights movement! The capacity for increased carnage should not be celebrated as a victory!
I cannot help but think about those that are on the receiving end of US military aggression. So a minor change has occurred at the input juncture of the war machine, but the output remains the same: we dismantle systems of indigenous governance, support disingenuous often criminal overlords, commit endless acts of brutality, and worst of all leave entire nations rudderless, spiraling downwards into the same abyss that engulfs the US military's lack of accountability.
I wonder what the response towards don't ask, don't will be overseas? I wonder if mothers across the Swat Valley in Northern Pakistan are cheering the repeal of the act (most likely not), gathering in the streets to celebrate a victory in the global pursuit of human equality, only to be forced to take cover as yet another hellfire-laden drone appears on the horizon. Hell hath no fury, as a drone operated from somewhere south of the Mason-Dixon Line.
Don’t equal human rights extend to those that the Empire has mislabeled as the "enemy"? Or do we now have to ignore the fact that innocent people are being slaughtered by the thousands?
Unjust binaries
We live in a world governed by binaries, straight or gay, them or us, freedom or tyranny. Until we break away from this norm, we shall forever be shackled to a narrow existence, manipulated by a political establishment that serves its own interests.
We should embrace complication, appreciate difference and most of all not be duped into accepting "victories" that clearly benefit an elite, that you and me (pardon the binary) will never be part of.
Some of us in the peace movement work really hard to keep our young people out of the hands of the war machine that preys on disadvantaged young people in inner cities and poor rural settings.
To see a demographic that is (without appearing to stereotypes) traditionally better educated, more politically progressive, and economically advantaged fight to join this killing machine is very disheartening.
I can see how one could view the repeal as a step forward, framed in the context dictated by the political elites of the Washington beltway. I can imagine much displeasure amongst the military brass – but I cannot reiterate enough how this is not a progressive moment in the social history of the United States.
The US military is not a human rights organisation and nowhere near a healthy place to earn a living or raise a family. My email box is filled with stories of mostly straight soldiers and their families who were deeply harmed by life in the military.
Because of the callous and violent nature of the system, Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) is on the rise and suicide rates among veterans and the spouses of active duty soldiers are skyrocketing.
Veterans still find it very difficult to access the services, benefits and bonuses that were promised to them by their recruiters. I cannot imagine the repealing of DADT significantly improving the material conditions experienced by gays during military service.
While the children of war profiteers and politicians are protected from any kind of sacrifice, this Empire preys on the rest of our youth - gay/straight; male/female - and spits their mangled or dead bodies onto the dung heap of history, without a qualm or a twinge of conscience.
Joining the US military should never be an option for the socially conscious while our troops are being used as corporate tools for profit, or hired assassins for imperial expansion. Soldiers are called: "Bullet sponges," by their superiors and "dumb animals" by Henry Kissinger, the former secretary of state.
While soldiers are dehumanised and treated like dirt, they are taught to dehumanise "the other", and treat them as less than dirt. It is a vicious cycle, and the way to stop a vicious cycle is to denounce and reject it, not openly participate.
I want to bang my head against a wall when another young gay person commits suicide as a result despicable bullying, yet people within the same community have fought hard for the right to openly join the biggest bully ever! Don’t go, don’t kill!
Cindy Sheehan is the mother of Specialist Casey A. Sheehan, who was killed in Iraq on April 4, 2004. Since then, she has been an activist for peace and human rights. She has published five books, has her own Internet radio show, Cindy Sheehan's Soapbox, and has been nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize. You can learn more about Cindy at Peace of the Action.
The views expressed in this article are the author's own and do not necessarily reflect Al Jazeera's editorial policy.
- Login to post comments
- Email this page
- Printer-friendly version
To be honest, I don't care about that and will prefer to care about the following, f.e.
"Do we really think that the US congress vote to repeal the act and Obama signing the bill is going to stop the current systemic" murder, mass murder, and destruction criminally committed by the US military?
And, what about what the following two-part article or series says?
"Rape rampant in US military
Statistics and soldiers' testimonies reveal a harrowing epidemic of sexual assault in the US military"
by Dahr Jamail, Dec. 21, 2010
http://english.aljazeera.net/indepth/features/2010/12/201012218254634455...
"Military sexual abuse 'staggering': the often hidden world of rape and abuse in the US military
Part II"
by Dahr Jamail, AlJazeera, Dec. 23, 2010
www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=22495
Excerpting from the Dec. 21st article:
More comments based on Cindy Sheehan's article:
It is; although, it's a little difficult to see or imagine that there's much left before reaching the end of the path. And that might be very terminal.
"2011: Prospects for Humanity?
The First and Second World Wars currently hover like the Sword of Damocles over the heads of all humanity"
by Prof. Francis Boyle, Dec. 24, 2010
www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=22500
Anyway, I don't believe the situation leaves any real possibility of there being a right to join the military; no more than we have the right to join any violent organized crime group. The only homosexuals who want to join are insane and don't care about mass-murdering innocent populations, et cetera. They want the right to serve wars of aggression and there is no such right possible.
People need to develop a conscience and to acquire real common sense. If that is done, then mature homosexuals would not want to join the military and would also realize that even if Washington permits them to enlist without needing to keep their sexual orientation secret, this hardly will do this world and American society any good. Many social ills, wrongs will continue to exist and there are far more important ones than whether, or not, gays can be openly gay in the military; like, f.e., the wars of aggression, racial discrimination, the "war" on migrant workers in the US and who are only trying to economically survive, for themselves and extremely poor family members back home, [because] of the extreme destruction Washington and Wall Street committed against the countries these workers come from, and so on. There are far greater issues than open vs secret gayness in the military.
The most important issues are where focus and energy need to be placed; not nonsensical, infantile, utopist gayness.
They can and should join the anti-war and pro-justice movements, where they can be openly gay without ever being attacked, either physically or verbally; but, oh no, they want to serve wars of aggression, mass murder, destruction, imperialism, [apocalypse]. I have no sympathy for sociopaths and psychopaths; pity, perhaps, but not sympathy and definitely no empathy.