You are hereBlogs / flacafina's blog / HONORING THOSE WHO CHOOSE TO KILL
HONORING THOSE WHO CHOOSE TO KILL
A couple of months ago as I returned home on my bike from our U.S. Boat to Gaza fundraiser, I was hit by a car in a pedestrian crosswalk at a cronically treacherous intersection woefully in need of law enforcement. Fortunately, I suffered only a jammed wrist and a scraped leg. My bike, sad to say, was totaled. So, today when I went to my nearby Perfomance Bike shop to pick-up it's replacement, the cost close to $400, to my dismay, military personnel were there receiving 20% off of their purchases. To "honor" their service the ad stated. I asked the attendant, Corey, when will I receive 20% off as a peace activist, children's advocate and librarian? He shook his head and replied, "You'll have to ask the folks who are smarter than me about that." Smarter? I doubt it!
I do NOT honor the service of the troops in Iraq and Afghanistan! I am so sick of hearing people "honor" the service of our military, giving them recognition, discounts, preferred treatment and gifts. The same military responsible, YES, responsible for the rapes and murders of many of our young women in the SAME military. The military responsible for the gang rape of 14 year old Abeer Qassim al Hamza, her murder and mutilation of her body. The execution of her parents and little sister and hundreds of thousands of other Iraqis and Afghanis the ENTIRE WORLD knows were INNOCENT "collateral damage" at best or deliberately targeted at worst, as if they were simply images on the screen of a video game.
There is no honor in following these orders. It didn't work for those on trial at Nuremberg and nor does it in Iraq, Afghanistan.
Let us HONOR those who chose NOT to participate in these wars of choice and continued occupation. Let us recognize THEM and THEIR families, today!
- flacafina's blog
- Login to post comments
- Email this page
- Printer-friendly version
First, a little commentary:
I agree that people who opposed this war from the start and before the actual start of it, and people who woke up to reality later and became firmly opposed to the continuation of these wars, as well as regretting having ever given any support for them, merit recognition. And the people who opposed the idea of this war before it was officially launched merit to be thanked for having at least tried to prevent these wars. It happened much more clearly for the war on Iraq than it did for the war on Afghanistan, but there were greatly honorable people who excellently opposed supporting that war's launch, as well. The people who opposed both wars before they were actually launched are the ones who acted most honorably and if everyone was like them, then the USA finally would be able to be justly recognized as a great country, but [most] Americans faultered and the US, therefore, never has been and still isn't a great or honorable country.
Re. military forces:
Washington and the military commanders are the ones to be held most accountable, but you are right about there being nothing honorable in having served in these criminal wars; although, or however, I'll state one or some exceptions.
Troops who had and retained real conscience during the tours served in these wars and did not commit what clearly could only be crimes because of their consciences acted honorably. Pat and evidently Kevin Tillman, both, are examples, and there are others. It's sad that they mistook lies for truth at first, but they didn't lose their consciences and simply acted a little hastily in accepting to believe Washington, at first; until they learned for themselves the harder way that they and we were all lied to.
There are soldiers who've acted honorably after returning from tours in these wars and speaking out publicly against these wars and criminal Washington, and Mike Prysner is one example. He's accurately denounced Washington as our "greatest enemy" and there are videos at Youtube of him speaking excellently.
I recall having read at the start or very early into the war that there were some US troops whose consciences could not permit them to tolerate serving in this war and they went to military chaplains to express their conscientious inability to continue. That was an honorable thing to do and it permitted readers of these articles to learn of how [evil] these military chaplains were and therefore are; priests of Satan and not of God! Hell will be receiving their souls.
Some soldiers honorably testified about having been members of units that [deliberately] killed, murdered Iraqis, including driving large military vehicles over Iraqi civilians, who included [children]. These soldiers who testified weren't the drivers and didn't agree with these acts, so these extreme and disgusting crimes can't be held against them; and they honorably provided their public testimonies.
So I don't agree that none of the troops acted honorably. However, the whole of these wars has been hellishly dishonorable and the greatest to blame are Washington and military commanders, as well as cold-bloodedly murderous sergeants and officers directly responsible for troop units.
There nevertheless are many of the troops who committed extreme crimes that no one could commit without realizing that these were indeed extremely criminal acts. And the following two-part article by the excellent Felicity Arbuthnot gives some examples that are very important, and rather horrific.
"Toppling a country: from Statue to Legality"
by Felicity Arbuthnot, Oct. 21st, 2010
www.uruknet.info/?p=m70986
The above excerpt is only to give an idea of what part I is about. The last part of it is about DU, some important information about it that perhaps many people are still unaware of, but, and up to that point, part I provides plenty of additional important information on what clearly were [obvious] and extreme crimes committed by the US troops.
"Toppling a Country : From Statue to Legality (Part Two.*)"
by Felicity Arbuthnot, Nov. 8th, 2010
www.uruknet.info/?p=m71626
The article goes on to describe plenty of important and horrific examples of extreme crimes that [no] could have mistaken for anything else. The whole of both parts is important reading.
It's [clear] that many troops committed crimes that could not be mistaken for anything else; cold-blooded murder, other extreme crimes, and serious theft. Commanders are to be held accountable, if that is ever possible, but troops definitely committed crimes that they could not credibly have thought to be anything else. They'd all know damn well that many of their acts in Iraq would get them life sentences of prison and possibly death penalties if they committed crimes at all similar in the US. They wouldn't get such sentences for material and financial theft, but they'd still be subject to serious sentences for these crimes.
Heck, there are a couple of American women who've been in prison for I believe 15 years, now, for a meager theft of $11.