You are hereBlogs / Nick Egnatz's blog / A New Contract for America
A New Contract for America
The U.S. working class has always been divided—along racial lines, against each succeeding wave of immigrants and now between the haves and the have-nots.
Nowhere is the divide and conquer strategy more evident than Wisconsin where newly elected Republican Governor Scott Walker, after passing pro business legislation to the tune of $140 million, now claims a $137 million deficit and is pushing through legislation to make up the newly created shortfall on the backs of the state’s public union workers. But his proposed legislation goes beyond fiscal sacrifice: it will strip the union workers of the right to collective bargaining and no longer allow union dues to be tax deductible.
Read the rest at
http://www.intrepidreport.com/archives/678
- Nick Egnatz's blog
- Login to post comments
- Email this page
- Printer-friendly version
This is a very important article.
"War, Martial Law, and the Economic Crisis
Excerpt from "The Global Economic Crisis: The Great Depression of the XXI Century""
by Peter Dale Scott, Feb. 23, 2011
www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=23354
Nick Egnatz's full article is certainly interesting, but I can't imagine it being supported, more than little in the society that the US is. I'd support what he proposes, but doubt that more than relatively few Americans would do the same. Some who wouldn't support it might do this because while they agreed with him, they could only perceive his proposal as an impossible dream and then walk away.
The counter-attack by the rich would be extremely strong, that's for sure. They definitely wouldn't be willing to be taxed at 90% of their earned and mostly unearned income over $1mn. It'd require an extreme amount of good will from them and it's extremely difficult to obtain one ounce of good will from them as it is. They would fight this high taxation with great viciousness, and they could very promptly resort to getting their bought politicians to establish martial law.
The Intrepid Report home page had the following article linked.
"Fighting the 5 fascisms in Wisconsin and Ohio"
by Bob Fitrakis and Harvey Wasserman, Feb. 23, 2011
www.intrepidreport.com/archives/633
Based on what I've read about what Mussolini said, the above should be corporatism, rather than fascism. He explained the simple distinction between the two terms. But corporatism certainly is applied in ways that seem to be fascism. We could probably say that they're "cousins", say; just that the difference between the two types of regime is also worth taking note of. Based on the difference, the US definitely is corporatist, but I guess it sometimes is also fascist without corporate "interests" being involved or part of the motive.