You are herecontent / The Federal Reserve Abolition Act
The Federal Reserve Abolition Act
The Federal Reserve Abolition Act
by Stephen Lendman
On June 15, 2007, Ron Paul introduced HR 2755: Federal Reserve Abolition Act. There were no co-sponsors, no further action was taken, and the legislation was referred to the House Committee on Financial Services and effectively pigeonholed and ignored.
It's a bold and needed measure to "abolish the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System and the Federal reserve banks, to repeal the Federal Reserve Act, and for other purposes."
The bill provides for management of employees, assets and liabilities of the Board during a dissolution period, and more as follows:
- it designates the Director of the Office of Management and Budget to liquidate Fed assets in an orderly and expeditious manner;
- transfer them to the General Fund of the Treasury after satisfying all claims against the Board and any Federal reserve bank;
- assume all outstanding Board and member bank liabilities and transfer them to the Secretary of the Treasury; and
- after an 18-month period, submit a report to Congress "containing a detailed description of the actions taken to implement this Act and any actions or issues relating to such implementation that remain uncompleted or unresolved as of the date of the report."
On November 22, "End the Fed" protests were held in 39 or more cities nationwide (including New York, Chicago, Los Angeles and Washington, DC), but you'd hardly know it for lack of coverage. Attendee demands were simple and emphatic:
- end a private banking cartel's illegal monopoly control over the nation's money supply and price;
- return that power to the US Treasury as the Constitution mandates;
- end a fiat currency system backed by the waning full faith and credit of the government; and
- return the country to a sound, hard currency monetary system.
"End the Fed! Sound Money for America!" is their slogan, and writer and US policy critic Webster Tarpley puts it well:
"....the privately owned central bank....has been looting and wrecking the US economy for almost a hundred years. We must end a system where unelected, unaccountable cliques of bankers and financiers loyal to names like Morgan, Rockefeller, and Mellon set interest rates and money supply behind closed doors, leading to de-industrialization, mass impoverishment, and a world economic and financial depression of incalculable severity."
In theory, the Fed was established to stabilize the economy, smooth out the business cycle, manage a healthy, sustainable growth rate, and maintain stable prices. In fact, it failed dismally. It contributed to 19 US recessions (including the Great Depression) and significantly to the following equity market declines that accompanied them as measured by the Dow or S & P 500 average - the S &P's inception was 1923; it became the S & P 500 in 1957:
- 40.1% (Dow) from 1916 - 1917;
- 46.6% (Dow) from 1919 - 1921;
- the 1929 (Dow) crash in two stages - 47.9% in 1929 followed by a strong, temporary rebound; then - 86%; an 89% peak to trough total from October 1929 to July 1932;
- 49.1% (Dow) from 1937 - 1938;
- 40.4% (Dow) from 1939 - 1942;
- 25.3% (S & P) from 1946 - 1947;
- 19.8% (S & P) in 1957;
- 26.8% (S & P) from 1961 - 1962;
- 19.3% (S & P) in 1966;
- 32.7% (S & P) from 1968 - 1970;
- 45.1% (S & P) from 1973 - 1974;
- 20.2% (S & P) from 1980 - 1982;
- 32.9% (S & P) in 1987;
- 19.2% (S & P) in 1990;
- 18.8% (S & P) in 1998;
- 49.1% (S & P) from 2000 - 2002; and
- about 50% (S & P) and counting (excluding a bear market rebound) from October 2007.
The Fed is also directly responsible for monetary inflation and the decline in the US standard of living since its year end 1913 inception and especially since the 1970s. From the late 18th century to 1913, virtually no inflation existed under the gold standard except during times of war. Using government data, it now takes over $2000 to equal $100 of pre-Fed purchasing power. In other words, a 1913 dollar is worth about a nickel today.
At that time, a dollar was defined as 1/20 of an ounce of gold or about an ounce of silver. The Fed then changed the standard away from precious metals to the full faith and credit of the government. Ever since (except for periods such as the 1930s) inflation eroded the currency's value and (more than ever) continues to do it today.
It's why one analyst calls the dollar "nothing more than a popular symbol for the tangible substances it once represented - gold and silver." Its true value represents the world's waning confidence in America's ability to honor its debt obligations, and with good reason.
Under the Federal Reserve System (besides inflation), we've had rising consumer debt; record budget and trade deficits; a soaring national debt; a high level of personal and business bankruptcies; today, millions of home foreclosures; high unemployment; the loss of the nation's manufacturing base; growing millions in poverty; an unprecedented wealth gap between the rich and all others; and a hugely unstable economy now lurching into crisis mode.
In a November 24 Wall Street Journal op-ed, Hong Kong-based author and equity strategist Christopher Wood believes "The Fed Is Out of Ammunition." With trillions in personal wealth erased, "there is little doubt that we are witnessing a classic debt-deflation bust at work, characterized by falling prices, frozen credit markets and plummeting asset values."
He notes how "over-investment and over-speculation" on borrowed money got us here. Today, the Fed can control the supply of money but not its velocity or the rate it turns over. The current collapse set it in reverse with no signs of an impending turnaround.
Wood believes monetary and fiscal measures won't work. There are no easy solutions - "not as long as politicians and central bankers (won't) let financial institutions fail," and let market forces wash out excesses over time.
The Fed and Treasury will spend trillions of dollars to correct things, "but will merely compound (the problem) by adding debt to debt." The current crisis will end up "discrediting mechanical monetarism - and with it the fiat paper-money system....The catalyst will be foreign creditors fleeing the dollar for gold. That will in turn lead to global recognition of the need for a vastly more disciplined global financial system" with gold very likely playing a part.
Absent a hard money currency has led to the kind of monetary madness that Nouriel Roubini calls "crazy" policy actions - an explosion of quantitative easing in the trillions with no end of it in sight.
Roubini: "The Fed Funds rate has been abandoned...as we are already effectively at (zero interest rates) that signal a liquidity trap....Even (a sharp) fall in mortgage rates....will be of small comfort to debt burdened households as only those (that) qualify for refinancing will be able to" net out a "modest" monthly mortgage saving of about $150.
The Fed's "desperate policy actions....will eventually lead to much higher real interest rates on the public debt and weaken the US dollar (the result of a) tsunami of implicit and explicit public liabilities and monetary debt." It will get foreign investors to "ponder the long-term sustainability of the US domestic and external liabilities," and why not. They keep growing exponentially, and with nothing restraining a runaway Fed, dollar debasing may continue to the point where no one will want to hold them. It's gotten some analysts to recommend moving a portion of savings out of them into gold - the ultimate safe haven in times of crisis.
Abolish the Fed and Return the Nation's Money Creation Power to Congress Where It Belongs
Ron Paul has been in the vanguard of the Abolish the Fed movement, and on September 10, 2002 on the House floor said:
"Since the creation of the Federal Reserve, middle and working-class Americans have been victimized by a boom-and-bust monetary policy. In addition, most Americans have suffered a steadily eroding purchasing power because of the Federal Reserve's inflationary policies. This represents a real, if hidden, tax imposed on the American people...."
"It is time for the Congress to put the interests of the American people ahead of the special interests. Abolishing the Federal Reserve will allow Congress to reassert its constitutional authority over monetary policy."
"Abolishing the Federal Reserve and returning to a constitutional system (as mandated) will enable America to return to the type of monetary system envisioned by our nation's founders: one where the value of money is consistent because it is tied to a commodity such as gold....I urge my colleagues (to co-sponsor) my legislation to abolish the Federal Reserve."
Paul introduced his legislation in the 106th, 107th, 108th, and 110th Congresses. Each time, it died in committee. On November 22, he attended the End the Fed rally in Houston and addressed the crowd.
He called the current economic crisis as bad or worse than in the 1930s and said: "we know who caused it. It was the Federal Reserve that gave us all this trouble." He explained that we had a "free ride for decades because we've had a system that was devised where the dollar could act as if it were gold."
Not after August 1971 when Nixon closed the gold window, ended the 1944 Bretton Woods Agreement, and no longer let dollars be backed by gold or converted into it in international markets. A "new economic system" was created. It let us "spend beyond our means, live beyond our means, print money beyond our means," and it caused our current dilemma.
We created "an appearance of great wealth. But it was doomed to fail," and it became apparent in the past year: "the failure of the dollar reserve standard that was set up in August of 1971. It has ended. The only question" is what will replace it?
There's all kinds of talk, including setting up a new international fiat currency "with the loss of US sovereignty in total. We have to stop this move towards one world government and a one world currency." Otherwise our freedom and Constitution will be lost. When it was written, it contained prohibitions.
Article I, Section 8 gives Congress alone the right to coin (create) money and regulate the value thereof. The founders also wanted gold and silver to be legal tender, not fiat money, nor should there be a central bank. In 1935, the Supreme Court ruled that Congress cannot constitutionally delegate this power to another body. By creating the Federal Reserve System in 1913, Congress violated the Constitution it was sworn to uphold and defrauded the American public. Today's crisis is the fruit of its action, but watch out.
"The writing is on the wall, and the end of this system" approaches. "They cannot patch it up, they can't up it back together again. They know it and we know it. The only argument is what is it going to be replaced with?"
For now, "Central banks in the West especially have been dumping gold to artificially lower (its price) to pretend the dollar is of great value. They're still doing it, but they're running out of time (and) out of gold." It's shifting to stronger economic powers, ones who've been saving money, loaning it back to us, "and are ready to buy up America if we continue to do this. So it is a contest (between fiat) money and hard money, and that is such an important issue." It reflects what Daniel Webster once said:
"There can be no legal tender in this country....but gold and silver. This is a constitutional principle....of the very highest importance." Gold, however, wasn't the original monetary system standard. Silver was, the silver dollar, and only a constitutional amendment can change it.
Paper currency as well, whether backed by gold or not, wasn't the hard money authorized by the Constitution. Honest money is honest weights and measures of silver and gold. Federal Reserve Notes are paper fiat debt obligations. Fiat currency of any kind is a mechanism of wealth transference from the public to a privileged elite - through inflation and loss of purchasing power. It creates debt for the many and wealth for the few, especially when a private banking cartel controls it.
Our existing monetary system combines money, credit and debt into a dishonest system of empty promises in exchange for future ones. There is no eventual payment, only unfulfillable assurances to new generations that will be forced to pay for the debt now accumulated. It's a moneychangers dream - ever-expanding debt and a continuing interest rate stream, masquerading as wealth creation for the people. It's in fact a system of bondage and indebtedness benefitting the few at the expense of the many, a modern-day feudalism. It's how an elite 1% got to own 70% of the nation's wealth.
In the 1920s, Josiah Stamp, Bank of England president said:
"Banking was conceived in iniquity and was born in sin. Bankers own the earth. Take it away from them, but leave them the power to create deposits, and with a flick of the pen (today a computer keyboard) they will create enough deposits to buy it back again. However, take it away from them, and all the great fortunes like mine will disappear, and they ought to disappear, for this would be a happier and better world to live in. But if you wish to remain the slaves of Bankers and pay the cost of your own slavery, let them continue to create deposits."
Creating the Federal Reserve System to let bankers and not the government control the price and amount of fiat money debased the currency and is the root cause of today's financial problems. A return to honest gold and silver weights and measures is needed. The Constitution states that nothing but these metals are money and that paper bills of credit (like Federal Reserve notes) aren't allowed. Even ones backed by gold as the Constitution doesn't grant Congress the power to be bankers. It may only coin (create) and borrow money, not loan it out or give it away - and certainly not to bankers at the expense of the public interest.
Further, the Constitution contains no provision allowing Congress to enact legal tender laws. Article I, Section 10 forbids the individual states from making "anything but gold and silver coin a legal tender in payment of debts." However, US Code, 31 USC 5103, establishes US coins and currency, including Federal Reserve notes, as legal tender and has been used to debase the currency ever since - the way Gresham's Law works: bad (or debased) money drives out good (the kind with little difference between its nominal and commodity values).
For example, until 1964, US coins (except pennies and nickels) contained 90% silver. Starting in 1965, dimes and quarters were converted to their current nickel - copper composition. Half-dollars (now produced in limited quantities) had 90% silver. It then dropped to 40% in 1965 and by 1971 all US coins (except pennies and commemorative mintings) contained nickel and copper and no silver - a good example of debasing. As for paper currency, it's just paper.
Under a private banking cartel's control, it's been misused, stolen, and corrupted the way New York Times columnist Floyd Norris suggests in his November 24 article headlined: "Another Crisis, Another Guarantee." First the banks, then the auto companies, and who knows who's next in line for theirs. "As the nation's obligations rise into the trillions, at some point investors (and the public) may begin to question whether a government running huge deficits can also credibly promise that the dollar will not lose its value." How can there be any faith and credit left when it's vanishing and the Fed and Treasury operate like giant hedge funds.
It got UK-based Eclectica Asset Management chief investment officer, Hugh Hendry, concerned enough to say: "All (US) financials will be owned by the government in a year. I bet you. It's not good," but it's coming. US taxpayers will be "paying for this for a long time," and it's deeply concerning considering the amount of money creation - with no end in sight as problems keep mounting and limitless amounts keep being thrown at them.
On November 25 the Financial Times associate editor, Wolfgang Munchau, also worries about the Fed's "weapon of mass desperation" (so-called quantitative easing); focusing only on deflation and risking a currency crisis. He calls it a flawed, dangerous and shocking oversight - the possibility of "a mass flight out of dollar assets (at some point) and a large rise in US market interest rates, followed by a huge recession."
A Bloomberg.com November 24 headline highlights the problem: "US Pledges Top $7.7 trillion to Ease Frozen Credit," and it might as well have said there's plenty more where that came from if needed. With another $800 committed to two new loan programs the total reached $8.5 trillion, according to Bloomberg or nearly 60% of US 2007 GDP of $14 trillion, and the numbers keep rising exponentially because the problems continue to mount.
Bloomberg puts it in perspective saying "the (current) commitment dwarfs (TARP and puts) Federal Reserve lending last week (at) 1900 times the weekly average for the three years before the crisis," and with the added $800 billion it's about 2100 times pre-crisis levels.
In addition, the Fed refuses to identify recipients of about $2 trillion of emergency handouts or what troubled assets (if any) it's accepting as collateral. Call it lending or spending. They're public tax dollars being spread around like confetti and debasing it all as a result.
The Free Lakota Bank
On November 21, this writer discussed how Lakotahs are treated in an article titled "Fate of Lakotahs Highlights America's Failed Native American Policies." On November 24, the following press release and follow-up information announced:
"People of Lakota Launch Private Bank for Only Silver and Gold Currencies." All deposits are "liquid, meaning they can be withdrawn at any time in minted rounds. Some may confuse our economic system with isolationism....which it is not. Since we currently produce much more than we consume, we have the right to decide what medium of exchange to accept for our effort. And so we accept only value for value. Across our great land, over thousands of tribes and merchants participate in our system of trade. We invite others to trade with us and bring value back into our transactions."
This is the world's first non-reserve, non-fractional bank that accepts only silver and gold currencies for deposit. The Lakotas "invite people of any creed, faith or heritage to unite in an effort to reclaim control of wealth. It is our hope that other tribal nations and American citizens recognize the importance of silver and gold as currency and decide to mirror our system of honest trade."
The bank states that it issues, circulates and accepts for deposit "only AOCS - Approved silver and gold currencies." It calls paper not real money but "merely a promise to pay - a mortgage on wealth that does not exist, backed by a gun aimed at those who are expected to produce it. Since we deal only in real money, we do not participate in any central bank looting schemes." When corruption is rewarded and "honesty becom(es) self-sacrifice....you may know that your society is doomed." Even as victims of adversity, Lakotas are working to prevent it.
End the Fed
Privatized money control is the single greatest threat to democratic freedom. As former lawyer, economist, academic, and Canadian prime minister (from 1935 - 1948) William Lyon Mackenzie King once said:
"Until the control of the issue of currency and credit is restored to government and recognized as its most conspicuous and sacred responsibility, all talk of sovereignty of Parliament and of democracy is idle and futile....Once a nation parts with control of its credit, it matters not who makes (its) laws....Usury once in control will wreck any nation," and indeed it has, far more now than ever.
It worried Thomas Jefferson enough to call banking institutions "more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies" at a much simpler time in our history. The right to create and control money belongs to the people through their elected representatives. For the past 95 years, powerful bankers accountable to no one have had it. They effectively run the country (and own it), and unless We the People change things, we'll continue to be victimized by economic tyranny and the eventual political kind that's coming.
###
Stephen Lendman is a Research Associate of the Centre for Research on Globalization. He lives in Chicago and can be reached at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net.
Also visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com and listen to The Global Research News Hour on RepublicBroadcasting.org Monday through Friday at 10AM US Central time for cutting-edge discussions on world and national issues with distinguished guests. All programs are archived for easy listening.
- Login to post comments
- Email this page
- Printer-friendly version
national economics reformation act once they anounce it becomes law. bill clinton sighned it in 1999 the supreme court put a gag order on it . check this site out www nesara.us
NESARA: Nearly Every Stupid Absurdity Rolled Altogether
Feb. 17, 2004
Are you lucky enough not to have heard of NESARA? If you do enough grassroots progressive politics, chances are you will.
NESARA stands for the National Economic Security and Reformation Act, an act that was secretly passed by Congress and signed into law by President Clinton, and which will be announced in due time. NESARA will forgive all credit card, mortgage, and other bank debt, eliminate income tax, back currency with precious metals, accomplish regime change in Washington, and require the new President to declare peace.
Dove of Oneness - yes, Dove of Oneness -- explains that the US Supreme Court has insisted on secrecy. In fact, the attack on the World Trade Center may have been intended to prevent Alan Greenspan from announcing NESARA -- and it succeeded! But Admiral Sananda, who is in charge of Earth Shan's transition, gave the order weeks ago to the White Knights to announce NESARA. Things are ready! I have it third-hand that someone has direct contact with the White Knights.
Don't believe me? Do a Google search for NESARA - which I personally refer to as Nearly Every Stupid Absurdity Rolled Altogether - and read a few of the thousands of websites, including:
http://nesara.us
http://fourwinds10.com/
http://luisprada.com/Protected/what_is_nesara.htm
http://detailshere.com/nesara.htm
This site http://nesara.org rather disappointingly maintains that there is a bill called NESARA, but that it has not even been introduced yet. Meanwhile, this one http://quatloos.com/NESARA.htm says NESARA is all a scam being used to solicit donations and is quite possibly the work of communists.
I don't know about communists, but there are certainly plenty of leftists promoting the NESARA nonsense. However, if this benefits anyone politically it is probably George W. Bush. What do progressives gain by marginalizing a demand for peace and financial security by mixing it in with so much New Age gobbledygook?
Of course it's not a calculated strategy on the part of supporters: they believe this stuff as much as right-wingers several decades back (when things weren't all going THEIR way) believed some pretty extravagant stories about, yes, communists.
Can't you just picture the congressional hearings in 2022: "Are you now or have you ever been part of the conspiracy to cover up NESARA?"
While marginalizing peace and salvation from debt helps to mainstream a corporate political agenda, it also seems likely to encourage more debt. If I really "believed in" NESARA, meaning that all of my credit card debt would soon be wiped out, I'd quickly max out as many credit cards as I could get my hands on. In fact, I'd start the revolution early by giving contributions to those in need and to peace groups on my credit cards. If I could swing it, I'd buy a second house with a huge mortgage and give the house to someone homeless.
To my knowledge no one is doing these things, but I'd be surprised if some people weren't going a bit deeper into debt than they otherwise would have.
The main response to "belief in NESARA" - the phrase commonly employed by believers - seems to be resignation to inaction. Everything's going to be beautiful if we just sit back and wait. This attitude is expressed by people who have been volunteering for progressive presidential campaigns, such as that of Congressman Dennis Kucinich - campaigns that have been beaten down by a corporate media that delights in marginalizing demands for democracy, peace, and wealth for working families.
It's hard to blame people for giving up on action. I've felt the temptation in recent weeks to move abroad or at least away from the Washington DC area until the United States has a president less skilled at fomenting hatred and resentment around the world.
It sounds like Howard Dean might try to keep his activists active by redirecting them to John Edwards. But the Deaniacs who would have preferred Kucinich or Sharpton but went to Dean because the media told them to are already going to Kerry, because the media changed its mind. And many of the Dean supporters who really like Dean won't go to Edwards any more than they'll go to Kerry. They are in the same boat as the Kucitizens and Sharptonians who are trying to come to grips with failure. Some of them will back Nader if he runs. Others may back NESARA.
NESARA is, after all, not a completely new line of thought for most people. Nancy Reagan would probably have believed in it if she'd stayed single. All of the presidential candidates believe in one religion or another; there's an effective ban on anyone who doesn't believe running for president.
And while few may be following belief in NESARA to its logical conclusions by maxing out all possible debt, very few follow mainstream beliefs to their logical ends by putting their lives at the greatest possible risk for a noble cause in order to get to Heaven. Nonetheless, religion affects their behavior.
Religion can be good for progressive politics. A Republican governor in Alabama recently tried to pass a progressive tax plan by arguing that it was the Christian thing to do.
But wishful thinking - be it wishing for NESARA or imagining that everything happens according to someone's plan or insisting that death isn't really death -- discourages people from working to improve their lives and those of their descendants.
This kind of thinking provides us with a weak comfort to some in need, a shallow justification for some good work that people would be doing anyway, and a destructive force of great power crippling a wide variety of hopes and potentials.
Without religious thinking, we would not have such a hard time wiping out faith in the market and in Marxism, belief in the "unnaturalness" of homosexuality, adherence to principles and authorities even when harmful, acceptance of the status quo as divinely decreed, sexism, racism, glorification of revenge, political apathy, and an endless string of new NESARAs.
The Governor's appeal for fairer taxes did not work. It might have, and that would have been a good thing -- but it would still have been, and it was, damaging to the ongoing cause of progressive politics. So is NESARA.
Wishful Thinking and What it Does to Us
Being overly ambitious has a way to make you fail all endeavor. I am focused on but a small part in seeking justice. That is why I come here- to see how I can be of help. I'm not lazy and too old to be scared.
Everything Ron Paul has advocated that I've taken the time to examine turns out fraught with lunatic utopianism. Although I'm certainly no banking expert, this seems to fit the pattern.
To portray the Federal Reserve system as being under the control of mad, private bankers seems to be a real stretch. Although the system has some political independence, input into management of the system by the government is massive, including continuous Congressional oversight.
In fact, managers are government appointees with the top management appointed by the President with the consent of the Senate. Its operations are vital to the operation of the economy. The more one delves into Federal Reserve operations, the more unraveling the dependencies between the Federal Reserve system and the economy in order to install something completely different seems, on its face, a fool's errand.
And by the way, have to completely agree with David Swanson about the so-called NESARA pipe dream. It's so crazy I'm surprised Ron Paul hasn't taken up that banner, too.
I am liberal however when talking about economic i have to call him: Mr. Paul.
Please. For breakfast try this:
http://www.freedocumentaries.org/film.php?id=199
for Lunch try this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A4kxTkhwR_Q
And Perhaps by Dinner you will think Different.
For Example:
You said:
"To portray the Federal Reserve system as being under the control of mad, private bankers seems to be a real stretch."
Reply: No, they are not mad people, they know very well what they are doing: Since 1913 sucking from the American People his Money VIA "Federal income tax".
"Input into management of the system by the government is massive, including continuous Congressional oversight".
Reply:
Congress don't EVEN know how much GOLD the "Federal Reserve" still has.
" The top management appointed by the President with the consent of the Senate."
Reply: The Bankers give a little list to the president and he Just Pick One of those already selected by them.
"Its operations are vital to the operation of the economy"
Wouldn't be better if OUR GOVERMENT (like most of the countries)PRINT our OWN MONEY and removes this middle Man from the ecuation?
Conspiracy theories are always much more entertaining than dull, boring facts. Please see my comment, below.
Have a great New Year!
and knowledge of what the Fed is. You've been fed a steady diet of propaganda about Dr. Paul and wouldn't know a percentage of what he does about economics. For that matter, neither does Ben Bernanke, if you've ever seen him speechless, being grilled by Ron in Committee. Reread the article. It's not an opinion- it's a fact. The reason Ron Paul was totally blacked out by the media and portrayed as a "kook" is his rock solid Constitutional adherence and the Establishment isn't going to relinquish their pharaoh like power over the money. It IS a secretive society and there is ABSOLUTELY NO OVERSIGHT BY CONGRESS. Although it should be, per the U.S. Constitution. But, I can tell by your snap judgement and knee jerk response, you aren't much of an original (traditional?) thinker and would have the corporate controlled media steer you away from common sense and rationale thought. John F. Kennedy signed an XO (11110) to abolish the Federal Reserve System. He was dead three weeks later. Johnson immediately returned the dollar to FRS notes.
http://www.sonic.net/sentinel/naij2.html
So, justify this institution as being legit all you like, but it doesn't hold water under scrutiny. I bet you believe Sheriff Taylor and Aunt Bee were real too, when you were little. I did, then I grew up.
Amazing that via the tubes you've been able to discern facts about my experience and past that even I had no idea about. Those Christmas Ouija boards must have some powerful mojo.
Seriously, I'd urge you to explore sources that provide the mundane facts about the Federal Reserve system before relying on whatever your sources are. One place to start -- and I understand it's not definitive -- might be the Wikipedia entry on the Federal Reserve which reviews its history, operation, and relevant legislation. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_reserve)
Best wishes!
You did not read what you had for lunch:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A4kxTkhwR_Q
It debunks everything you said about the "FEDERAL RESERVE".
Please tell me honestly:
Do you really believe that those PRIVATE BANKERS will Take care more about the American people's Money rather than their OWN money?
That's not Conspiracy theory. Just take a look at your own PayRoll check:
That part that is called : "Federal Tax"
Go right to the "RELEVANT POCKETS" of Rockerfeller's team.
I hope that one day we will have OUR own:
NATIONAL RESERVE
an "editable" reference source that anyone can make changes too? That's your "facts"?
Well, let's see what it says;
"it is a quasi-public (government entity with private components) banking system"...
Member Banks
Each member bank is a private bank (e.g., a privately owned corporation) that holds stock in one of the twelve regional Federal Reserve banks.
this link will take you to the list of Member Banks that own the Richmond Federal Reserve Bank...
http://www.richmondfed.org/banking/federal_reserve_membership/state_memb...
Here are the first few from the Richmond Federal Reserve site;
ALLIANCE BK CORP
RSSD: 2712978
Bank Name: ALLIANCE BK CORP
Location: FAIRFAX, VA
In Millions
Assets: 568,824
Loans: 367,754
Deposits: 426,724
Capital: 51,618
FAIRFAX
AMERICASBANK
RSSD: 2471239
Bank Name: AMERICASBANK
Location: TOWSON, MD
In Millions
Assets: 152,415
Loans: 134,375
Deposits: 129,424
Capital: 11,557
TOWSON
BANK OF CHARLOTTE CTY
RSSD: 667524
Bank Name: BANK OF CHARLOTTE CTY
Location: PHENIX, VA
In Millions
Assets: 114,757
Loans: 85,086
Deposits: 95,023
Capital: 14,435
PHENIX
BANK OF CLARKE CTY
RSSD: 753324
Bank Name: BANK OF CLARKE CTY
Location: BERRYVILLE, VA
In Millions
Assets: 511,839
Loans: 387,327
Deposits: 372,662
Capital: 47,068
BERRYVILLE
BANK OF CURRITUCK
RSSD: 684325
Bank Name: BANK OF CURRITUCK
Location: MOYOCK, NC
In Millions
Assets: 179,874
Loans: 134,129
Deposits: 138,380
Capital: 18,597
MOYOCK
BANK OF ESSEX
RSSD: 781028
Bank Name: BANK OF ESSEX
Location: TAPPAHANNOCK, VA
In Millions
Assets: 382,604
Loans: 233,114
Deposits: 300,160
Capital: 53,554
TAPPAHANNOCK
BANK OF FLOYD
RSSD: 355821
Bank Name: BANK OF FLOYD
Location: FLOYD, VA
In Millions
Assets: 208,108
Loans: 123,438
Deposits: 188,604
Capital: 17,781
FLOYD
BANK OF GASSAWAY
RSSD: 491822
Bank Name: BANK OF GASSAWAY
Location: GASSAWAY, WV
In Millions
Assets: 154,897
Loans: 71,508
Deposits: 134,274
Capital: 19,584
GASSAWAY
BANK OF HAMPTON ROADS
RSSD: 1161029
Bank Name: BANK OF HAMPTON ROADS
Location: NORFOLK, VA
In Millions
Assets: 554,321
Loans: 493,388
Deposits: 434,558
Capital: 69,903
NORFOLK
BANK OF LANCASTER
RSSD: 34425
Bank Name: BANK OF LANCASTER
Location: KILMARNOCK, VA
In Millions
Assets: 323,887
Loans: 248,117
Deposits: 258,392
Capital: 26,019
KILMARNOCK
BANK OF MARION
RSSD: 858528
Bank Name: BANK OF MARION
Location: MARION, VA
In Millions
Assets: 333,761
Loans: 215,381
Deposits: 287,936
Capital: 36,500
MARION
BANK OF MCKENNEY
RSSD: 746429
Bank Name: BANK OF MCKENNEY
Location: MCKENNEY, VA
In Millions
Assets: 164,763
Loans: 108,348
Deposits: 137,619
Capital: 18,257
MCKENNEY
BANK OF MONROE
RSSD: 849432
Bank Name: BANK OF MONROE
Location: UNION, WV
In Millions
Assets: 98,705
Loans: 59,202
Deposits: 85,914
Capital: 12,268
UNION
BANK OF ROMNEY
RSSD: 722432
Bank Name: BANK OF ROMNEY
Location: ROMNEY, WV
In Millions
Assets: 224,386
Loans: 162,441
Deposits: 164,805
Capital: 25,737
ROMNEY
BANK OF THE COMMONWEALTH
RSSD: 821120
Bank Name: BANK OF THE COMMONWEALTH
Location: NORFOLK, VA
In Millions
Assets: 959,005
Loans: 884,787
Deposits: 702,370
Capital: 113,220
NORFOLK
BANK OF THE EASTERN SHORE
RSSD: 904425
Bank Name: BANK OF THE EASTERN SHORE
Location: CAMBRIDGE, MD
In Millions
Assets: 229,932
Loans: 176,571
Deposits: 182,882
Capital: 23,420
CAMBRIDGE
BANK OF THE JAMES
RSSD: 2787770
Bank Name: BANK OF THE JAMES
Location: LYNCHBURG, VA
In Millions
Assets: 305,991
Loans: 245,118
Deposits: 239,488
Capital: 24,292
LYNCHBURG
BANK OF VA
Current list of primary dealers
As of October 1, 2008 according to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York the list includes:
* BNP Paribas Securities Corp.
* Bank of America Securities LLC
* Barclays Capital Inc.
* Cantor Fitzgerald & Co.
* Citigroup Global Markets Inc.
* Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC
* Daiwa Securities America Inc.
* Deutsche Bank Securities Inc.
* Dresdner Kleinwort Securities LLC.
* Goldman, Sachs & Co.
* Greenwich Capital Markets Inc.
* HSBC Securities (USA) Inc.
* J. P. Morgan Securities Inc.
* Merrill Lynch Government Securities Inc.
* Mizuho Securities USA Inc.
* Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated
* UBS Securities LLC.
Thank you for asking for "facts"... you are correct. It is always better people see the actual Facts from the Federal Reserve's own websites so that they can better understand who really owns this system, and who is really serves.
http://www.wired.com/politics/onlinerights/news/2007/08/wiki_tracker will shed some light on how secure Wiki is. As soon as some truth comes out, there are others busily rewriting it. This is not a new practice. It's been going on, what, for CENTURIES now... I guess one does sleep better at nights, if one chooses to ignore the possibilities and/or the realities. "Ignorance is Bliss" and all that.