Take Action: Sign Move to Amend: Corporations Are Not People Entitled to Constitutional Rights

referrimg to cies as if they are people.

The US has been rendereded so dim witted that we have so-called leftists referring to cies in human terms and people as mere objects. People correctly bitch about cies not havimg human rights and gov't treating cies as persons, but we regularly see cies treated as persons, like referring to a company using "who", f.e., and persons referred to as objects, using "that" and "which", f.e. A company is a "that", "which", "it", ..., and not a "who", but people regularly use the reverse and complain about gov't treating cies as persons. People really need to make up their minds about which way they want this.

It's elementary grade learning. During elementary school we learn or used to learn that "who" only refers to persons, but now we have the word used for other animals, cies, etcetera, and hardly for persons, who, instead, are spoken of using the other aforementioned words.

People need to wake up. If we don't want cies, etcetera, treated as persons, then try leading by example, instead of leading contrary to complaints. If we say to not do something we are doing while possibly ignoring the fact that we do what we say should not be done, then don't bother wondering why we are not persuasive. Of course if we set fire to ourselves and tell other people to not copy such acts, then the situation differs. Most people will be immediately convinced that copying is then a bad idea. But when we speak of gov't wrongly treating cies as persons or citizens, then we don't have the same visual and immediate effects. It's much worse than one person setting fire to his or her-self, but while the latter is obvious, the former is not, except through analysis. Treating cies, etcetera, as persons is torching not only a whole society, it's torching others, as well.

But you all treat this in backwards, and asinine, fashion. You speak about cies as persons and then complain about cies being treated as persons. I say, what the hell are you complaining for? Show the way and then complain that the gov't follows your way.

Do you have any understanding at all, or have all of you been subjected to HAARP, and angels don't play this sort of instrument, btw.

You are the problem and marketing apparently has worked. Sheeple go for marketing, one of the most dumb-animal jobs to be in and teach.

People crusade about nuclear arms and energy, and there are real and present dangers, but a lot of this crusading is based on hypothetical future war that is very unlikely and many of us just don't join this crusade because it's really a non-seller. It's not persuasive enough. We can understand that nuclear war is bye-bye for most of us, but we can also not fear that it's likely to happen, for a couple of or a few reasons, but a main one is that if nuc. war did happen, then the ruling elites would also lose, so there's really no one to gain. So, nuclear war is just more left media scaremongering.

The left profits the rich elites as much as the right does, and possibly more.

Not George Soros, the Ford Foundation, the Gates Foundation, the CFR, Rothchilds, NOT any rich and powerful elites can permit nuclear war to happen, but they can all profit from the scaremongering, manufacturing, and politics,

War is a Racket.

Do not ask me how this could work, but all of the bla bla bla U.S. and European bs against Iran might possibly be profitable to some elites even if Iran is really not even thinking of having nuclear arms. Iran should have such arms, imo, but there is no indication that Iranian leadership wants nuclear arms or weapons.

There is a very weird drive or connection between bs and profit-making, and gov't is a main engine of bs. And Banksters love this arrangement.

War is a Racket.